Salbutamol versus theophylline for wheezy infant.

نویسندگان

  • C H Rasul
  • M A Khan
چکیده

OBJECTIVE To compare the tolerability and efficacy of salbutamol and theophylline in treating wheezy infant. DESIGN This was a prospective parallel group study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS Wheezy infants admitted in paediatric ward of Khulna Medical College Hospital from January 1998 to March 1999. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES Palatability of drugs, clinical efficacy of drugs and adverse events during treatment. RESULTS Ninety-five patients had undergone this study. Forty eight were was in salbutamol group and 47 in theophylline group. Clinical problem at the beginning was recurrent wheeze (46.3%), wheeze with fever (32.6%) and spasmodic cough (21.1%). Salbutamol was more palatable (P < 0.001) than theophylline. However efficacy of both the drugs were nearly equal (P > 0.1). Adverse effect was more frequent in theophylline treated children (47.4%) than in salbutamol group (24.4%). CONCLUSION Salbutamol is better tolerated than theophylline whereas both the drugs were equally effective for bronchodilation in infancy.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Paradoxical response to nebulised salbutamol in wheezy infants, assessed by partial expiratory flow-volume curves.

Lower airway responses to nebulised bronchodilators were studied in 18 chronically or recurrently wheezy infants, aged 3-15 months, by means of partial forced expiratory flow-volume manoeuvres performed with an inflatable jacket. Maximum flow at functional residual capacity (FRC) (VmaxFRC) was used as the index of intrathoracic airways function. Peak expiratory flow rate was also measured. Base...

متن کامل

Lung function response to bronchodilator nebulization via hood in wheezy infants: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND In infants, small volume nebulizers with a face mask are commonly used to facilitate aerosol therapy. However, infants may be disturbed by mask application, causing poor mask-to-face seal and thus reducing the dose delivered. OBJECTIVES To compare lung function response to bronchodilator nebulization via two delivery devices: hood versus mask. METHODS We studied 26 recurrently wh...

متن کامل

Effect of salbutamol in infants with wheezy bronchitis.

Using the technique of whole body plethysmography, lung mechanics were measured in a group of infants with wheezy bronchitis. Compared with a group of normal infants previously studied, airway resistance and thoracic gas volume were found to be raised. Nebulized salbutamol was then administered and measurements were repeated when it was found that there was no objective improvement. It is concl...

متن کامل

Inhaled salbutamol for wheezy infants: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Salbutamol is frequently used as a bronchodilator for infants who wheeze. Many single dose studies have questioned its effectiveness. AIMS To investigate the response of wheezy infants to salbutamol over an extended time period in order to elucidate either symptomatic relief or a protective effect. METHODS Eighty infants under 1 year, with persistent or recurrent wheeze and a per...

متن کامل

Sleep quality and nocturnal respiratory function with once-daily theophylline (Uniphyl) and inhaled salbutamol in patients with COPD.

We compared the effects of evening administration of sustained-release theophylline (Uniphyl) and qid inhaled beta 2-agonist (salbutamol, two 100-micrograms puffs) on sleep quality and nocturnal oxygen saturation in 20 patients with COPD. Patients with FEV1 less than 70% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio less than 70% were eligible to participate in this double-blind, crossover study, with 2-week tr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

دوره 51 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001